Librarians Association of the University of California - San Diego

Academic Review Documents

Workshop Documents

Policies & Guidelines

Other Useful Documents

Library Human Resources Academic Reviews Website

Writing Your Self Review (.ppt)

Self-Review Format (.doc)

Criteria, Comparison of Wording & Examples (Handy-dandy document) (.doc)

Matching Exercise

Writing Exercise (.doc)

Advancement Criteria:

  • Assistant
  • Associate (.doc)
  • Librarian

Workshop Evaluation

Best Practices for Department Heads/Review Initiators

(Documents forthcoming)

APM - Academic Personnel Manual - the policy manual for academic appointees in the UC system

ARPM - Academic Review Procedures Manual - the procedures manual for LAUC-SD (UCSD Librarians)



LAUC Position Paper No. 1 "Criteria for Appointment Promotion and Advancement in the Librarian Series"

LAUC Position Paper No. 3 "Documentation Guidelines for the Review of Librarians"

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

Academic Biography Form

CAPA's Instructions for Academic Biography Form

Librarian Roster

Librarian Series Salary Scale

ARPM Appendix X Statement of Goals

ARPM Appendix XI Distinguished Step

Glossary of Useful Acronyms, Abbreviations, Unique Words & Phrases

General Tips

  • Plan ahead:  thinking about your review during the year diminishes stress in the several weeks prior to your writing the self-review.
    • Keep an activities log or calendars of activities At the end of each year take time to review your accomplishments in light of peer review
    • Think strategically and be selective.  Quantity is not criteria for advancement; quality is.  Plan strategically with your supervisor so that s/he understands your advancement intentions. Say “yes” and “no” to opportunities with the review cycle in mind.   Accept or pursue opportunities so they work to your advantage: e.g.  run for an officer position when the service period will cover two review cycles. Plan to achieve Librarian VI, it doesn’t happen by accident. 

  • Read the ARPM before you start…yes, really…it will give you a comprehensive picture of the process.

  • Ask someone who has undergone the review process several times to read your self- review and give feedback. Ask someone outside your department. Ask your LAUC-SD buddy. Ask a previous CAPA member. Don’t rely solely on your review initiator; they may be new to the process too.

  • The "So What?" factor. Ask yourself continually: So what? Why does this matter?  How did you meet or exceed the criteria?   You are not asked to evaluate the quality of your own performance.  You are asked to describe your activities and contributions and why they are important.

Old Business

U.C. Librarian Peer Review: Another Model for Faculty Self-Governance
The MOU and You
Final report of pilot Self-Review Workshops

 

Last updated November 6, 2009

Send comments or questions to LAUC-SD Web Manager